Monday, July 27, 2015

Dancing with David: The Fall


July 26th, 2015                               “The Fall”                             Rev. Heather Jepsen

Summer Sermon Series: Dancing with David

2 Samuel 11

          Our summer sermon series, “Dancing with David” resumes this morning with the Biblical account of David’s affair with Bathsheba.  Although this is a story that you have all heard before, I am willing to bet that you haven’t spent very much time thinking about it.  As believers, we are not very fond of considering the sins of those we deem to be our Biblical heroes.  Following the commentary by Bruce Birch in the New Interpreter’s Bible, I propose that we would rather argue away David’s sin, and thus our own, than to face his evil acts head on.

          The story begins by setting the stage; it is the spring of the year and the time when kings go out into battle.  David’s forces, under the leadership of Joab are out in the field fighting the Ammonites but David the king has remained behind in Jerusalem.  As they say, “idle hands are the devil’s playground” and it won’t be long before David gets himself into trouble.

          While strolling on his roof one afternoon, David spies the lovely Bathsheba taking a bath.  He sends a messenger to find out who this beauty is, only to discover that she is married.  One would hope our hero would now turn away, as this woman belongs to another, but of course that does not happen.  David, seeing another challenge before him, another conquest to be had, decides that regardless of her marital status, this woman is his for the taking.

          Many Bible translations soften the language here, saying that David sent messengers to “get her” but that is not what the Hebrew says.  A truer translation of the Hebrew is that David “sent and took” Bathsheba, and she lay with him.  I’m not going to mince words here, what David does is akin to rape.  He is the king, and Bathsheba has neither the right nor the power to turn down his advances.  David saw her and he took her, using his royal power to satisfy his personal desires.  David is not interested in a relationship with Bathsheba at all, he simply wants to satisfy his sexual needs, and so he sends her straight home after his conquest.

          After some time, Bathsheba realizes that she is with child, and sends word to David telling him that she is pregnant.  This is a big problem for the king as he can now no longer hide his act of lust with her.  The text makes clear when Bathsheba’s last period was to prove that the child could only be David’s.  So, let the scheming begin.

          David’s first plan is to get Bathsheba’s husband, Uriah, to sleep with her so that the child will appear to be his.  David sends word to the battle field to have Uriah sent back home.  When Uriah arrives at the royal palace he tells David about how things are going out on the field of battle.  David tells Uriah to go to his house and to wash his feet, which is a euphemism for sex.  But Uriah cannot stand the thought of going home at such a time; all the other men are still out on the battle field and so he will abstain from the comforts of home in order to stand in solidarity with them.  David is frustrated and on the second evening he feasts with Uriah and gets him drunk.  Surely the drunken man will wander home and sleep with his wife.  But, Uriah remains true to his battle honor and sleeps at the palace with the servants rather than go home to Bathsheba.

          Thwarted, David sees the need to take drastic measures, namely to have Uriah killed.  He sends Uriah back to the battle field, carrying the very note to the commander Joab stating David’s evil plot.  Uriah is to be put on the front lines in hard battle so he will certainly die.

          Battle ensues and Uriah is indeed killed in action.  Joab sends word to David that the fighters approached the wall and that many were killed.  He fears for the life of the messenger, as David has been known to kill those who bring bad news, and so he tells the messenger to remind David that Uriah has also been killed in case his temper flares.

          When news of the battle reaches David, he shows no signs whatsoever of being upset or even feeling guilty.  He sends word back to Joab saying, “Do not let this matter be evil in your eyes,” (Again our readings soften the translation.)  “For the sword devours now one and now another.”  David is clear that the death of Uriah is to be thought of as nothing more than one more loss on the proud field of battle.

          When Bathsheba hears that Uriah is dead she goes through the proper period of mourning and then becomes one of David’s wives.  She will be his eighth wife to be exact.  As with many women in Biblical times, she really has no choice in the matter, as she is pregnant and could not survive on her own.  She will bear a son and David seems to have literally gotten away with murder until we read the last verse of the chapter.  “But the thing that David had done was evil in the eyes of the Lord.”  (Again, our readings soften the translation.)

          It is amazing that this story of David’s great sin has survived into the Biblical record.  Since the time that it was written, readers have been uncomfortable with the great evil committed by David.  When David’s story is retold in the book of Chronicles this portion is understandably left out.  Rape and murder are certainly not the acts of a man who was after God’s own heart.  Throughout history in both academics and popular culture, people have attempted to soften David’s sin.

          The most common (and I believe most troubling) way that people try to argue away David’s sin is by scapegoating.  Throughout the ages, Bathsheba has been painted as a seductress and co-conspirator in the fall of David.  In his commentary on the Old Testament, turn of the century scholar Morton Wharton goes as far as saying, “No one of good moral character could have acted as she did in her seduction and conquest of David.  She doubtless exposed herself that the king might be tempted; she willingly came to the palace when she was sent for, and she conspired with David for the murder of her husband.” 

          To scapegoat Bathsheba as the temptress who leads David astray, is a clear attempt to soften David’s guilt.  Even more troubling, commentator Birch points out that “these efforts to make Bathsheba the initiator are unfortunately consistent with a common defense in cases of rape and abuse of women: ‘She asked for it.’  Even our modern translations softening of the verb ‘take’ to make David’s messengers merely ‘get’ Bathsheba shows our unwillingness to face the coercion in David’s action.” 

          When we examine the text, it gives us nothing to go on regarding any guilt on Bathsheba’s part.  Bathsheba is hardly a character outside the object of David’s lust and she is frequently only referred to as “the woman” or “the wife of Uriah” rather than her own name.  She is nothing more than the object of David’s lustful desire until her pregnancy becomes the problem that he must solve through murder.  Furthermore the text makes it clear that it is the actions of David, and David alone, that are seen as evil in the eyes of the Lord.

          Another way we try to avoid David’s guilt is through rationalization.  Some have wondered if Uriah wasn’t an abusive husband and David saved Bathsheba from a horrible relationship.  Some have thought that it was Satan who led David to sin and who should carry part of the blame.  Or perhaps David’s repentance was so great that somehow his sin was absolved.  None of these arguments are supported in the text.

          The final way we try to soften this story is by romanticizing it.  It makes us feel better if we imagine that David and Bathsheba were somehow in love and couldn’t help themselves.  This has been Hollywood’s treatment of the story, as Gregory Peck and Susan Hayward famously told it in David and Bathsheba.  In that film Uriah is a busy soldier who neglects his wife, and David is the lonely king.  Together David and Bathsheba find true love and happiness.  Unfortunately, as much as we love a good romance, the Bible gives us none in its telling of the story.

          As I have stated, all the Bible give us here are the plain facts of rape and murder.  This is the story of the fallen hero, who has done great evil in the eyes of the Lord.  As believers, we struggle with this story, and for good reason, for who wants to see a good man go down.  Birch says, “the difficulty we have in facing the harsh reality of this story is a testimony to the ease with which we excuse our own sin.  But if we can face David’s sin for what it is, we may better face our own.”

          Our newspapers today are full of stories of the powerful succumbing to sinful behavior.  From scandals of bribery, to lies about having affairs, to the culture of sexism that reigns in many of our halls of government, our world is full of examples of those who would use their power and authority to manipulate others.  Many would argue that our world is going downhill, but the ancient story of David shows us that it has always been this way.  If we are willing to truthfully face David’s role in the rape of Bathsheba and the murder of Uriah, then we will be more inclined to truthfully face our own sinful nature.   

          To face the dark reality of one of our greatest Biblical heroes helps us to face the reality about ourselves.  It is all too easy to argue away our own sin, or the ease in which we attempt to manipulate people and circumstances in order to cover up our wrong doing.  The truth is that we have all sinned.  Thankfully, we have redemption through Jesus Christ, whose lineage can amazingly be traced all the way back to David . . . and Bathsheba.  Amen.

         

Monday, June 29, 2015

Dancing with David: Building a House


June 28th, 2015                          “Building a House”                     Rev. Heather Jepsen

Summer Sermon Series: Dancing with David

2 Samuel 7

          Today we are continuing with our summer sermon series, “Dancing with David.”  So far we have read and thought about David’s anointing by Samuel to be king over Israel, and David’s famous battle with the giant Goliath.  Last week we read about David bringing the ark into Jerusalem.  That story was full of surprises from the smiting of Uzzah, to the zeal of David’s dancing, to the sad tale of David’s wife Michal.  You may remember that for the writer of Samuel, the story of the ark coming to Jerusalem was all about politics and religion.  We will find those themes emerge again in our story today.

          When our reading begins, David is on top of the world.  By this time David has vanquished all his enemies and those who would speak against him.  He is at the height of his career as the King of Israel and I am inclined to believe that he is also at the high point of his whole life.  At this point the world is his oyster.  It is with this sense of bravado that David announces to the prophet Nathan that he is thinking about building a temple to keep the ark in Jerusalem.  Of course, David can do no wrong, so Nathan encourages him to go ahead with his plan.

          But, during the night, the word of the Lord comes to Nathan, making it clear that God has a whole different idea.  God says to Nathan that he has been happy to roam about with the people and the mobile ark.  He never asked for a house did he?  So Nathan should go remind David that it was God who plucked David up out of his life as a shepherd and made him King over Israel, and it is God who will build a house for David.

          This whole text hinges on a play on words that we lose in our English translations.  The Hebrew word for the temple that David is thinking about building is bet.  That word can also be used to mean house, like the city of Bethlehem which means “house of bread”.  The word bet also can be used to mean a dynasty.  That is where the whole passage turns.  David says he will build a house (bet) for the Lord meaning temple, but the Lord says he will build a house (bet again) for David meaning a dynasty.  The Lord promises that David’s family will always sit on the throne in Jerusalem.

          Well, Nathan takes this great vision to David and David is overwhelmed by God’s generosity.  Well, overwhelmed to a point.  Immediately David goes in to pray before the Lord.  At first David is humble before the Lord, showing deference to God’s will.  “Who am I to be so richly blessed?” he wonders.  Then David praises God, declaring that God is great and there is no other like him.  Then the prayer goes in a bit of a different direction, and one that readers up to this point find to be a common theme of David’s, demand.  “And now, O Lord God, as for the word you have spoken concerning me and my dynasty, confirm it forever as you have promised,” David says.  And again, he reminds God that God only speaks truth and so this promise of a dynasty, this promise of eternal power over the throne, should bless David’s family forever.  It’s quite the request.

           Now as I mentioned, the story of David is all about politics and this chapter is a shining example of that.  In fact, this chapter is central to the political themes of the Old Testament as a whole.  There is an awful lot going on here beneath the simple surface of Nathan’s vision and David’s prayer.  First of all, it is important to point out that this text has a complex history.  While the story of Nathan’s vision and David’s prayer certainly existed in the time of David, scholars are certain that it did not exist in this form.  Many writers have had their hand in this text, as is true for many of our favorite Bible passages, and so this text reflects the views of the later nation of Israel.

          Let me explain; politically this text is most significant for people after David’s time rather than during.  First of all, this text explains why David, the greatest king ever to reign in Israel did not build the temple, but that his son did.  Shouldn’t the best king ever have built the temple?  Well, this text makes it clear that God didn’t want a temple right then, but if David’s son built it that would be OK.  Along that line of thinking, this text says that God’s presence does not rely on the temple anyway.  This will be very important to the Israelites when the temple is destroyed and they are living in exile.

          As far as kingship in Israel, this text makes bold claims.  First of all, it legitimizes dynastic rule.  This is important.  The first king of Israel was Saul; David took the throne from Saul in a military coup.  This text states that only someone from David’s line can now legitimately become king.  Not only does this make the rulership of Israel strictly a family affair, it also negates any possibility for a coup in the future as no outsider could ever sit on the throne with God’s blessing.

          Probably most important, this text promises a ruler from David’s line into all eternity.  In verse 16 where God promises “Your house and your kingdom shall be made sure forever before me; your throne shall be established forever,” we find the very center of the whole Old Testament.  This is where the Jewish Messianic hope comes from; there will always be a Davidic monarch to rule in Israel.  It is from this passage that the Israelites will derive hope during exile.  They were sure that someone from David’s line would rule again, even if there was no throne in Israel at the time.  And this of course is why it’s so important to prove that Jesus was from the line of David.  Jesus had to be from David’s house in order to be the Messiah.

          And that leads us to the religious implications for this text.  The Jewish faith will become centered on this promise to David, this promise of faithfulness.  The hope that leads the Israelites through hard times is found here.  They believed that God’s promises were true, even when the world around them spoke otherwise.  We share this trait, as we continue to believe that the kingdom of God is here among us, even though the world around us is not what we hope.  Like the Israelites, we have faith in the promises of God, especially during hard times.

          The other religious theme in this text is God’s sovereignty.  David was so high with his own sense of power that he thought he should do something for God.  If David was being honored, then David should lift God up to be honored as well.  God made clear to the prophet Nathan that he didn’t need any help.  This was all about what God could do for David and not what David could do for God.  This was about God’s plan for David, not David’s plan for God.

          Eugene Peterson makes this point best when he writes,

God’s word to David through Nathan was essentially this: “You want to build me a house?  Forget it—I’m going to build you a house.  The kingdom that I’m shaping here isn’t what you do for me but what I do through you.  I’m doing the building here, not you.  I’m not going to let you confuse things by launching a building operation of your own.  If I let you fill Jerusalem with the sights and sounds of your building program—carpenters’ hammers, masons’ chisels, teamsters’ shouts—before long everyone will be caught up in what you are doing, and not attentive to what I am doing.  This is a kingdom that we’re dealing with, and I am the king.  I’ve gotten along without a so-called house for a long time now.  Where did you ever come up with the idea that I need or want a house?  If there’s any building to be done, I’m doing it.  

          How often do we get confused about what is our plan and what is God’s plan?  I think we do this in our own lives and in the life of the church.  While it is important to think of God and to keep God central in our plans, it is also important to keep our ears open for a word from others that might open our eyes to the plans that God has for us instead.

          How often do we ask the question about how we can build this house, this church for God?  We have a building, a facility, that demands a lot of attention.  And as our facility ages, the attention that it demands grows.  We spend a lot of time wondering how we can build up this house of God, wondering that we can do for God by taking care of these buildings.  We spend relatively little time wondering what God is doing for us.  How is God building us as people into the church?  How is God building churches, sacred spaces, into our own lives as individuals?  Like David, sometimes we need to stop and listen to consider God’s plans before we simply forge ahead with our own good ideas.

So, this is where we leave off for today.  David wants to build God a house, (temple) but God is going to build David a house (dynasty) instead.  The promises that God makes to David are really important here.  As I mentioned this is the highpoint of David kingship, and when you are at the top there is nowhere to go but down.  When I get back from my vacation we will see what David does that puts his place on the throne in jeopardy.  Amen.